Private alpha · Early access by invitation

Your case.
Fully mapped.
In minutes.

From demand letters to regulatory filings to arbitration submissions. Prilex reads your case files, extracts every fact, and builds the complete picture with citations to source, zero data retention by architecture.

prilex — terminal
Solutions

Case Intelligence Platform

Automated extraction, entity mapping, and chronology building for litigation, arbitration, investigations, and due diligence. One engine, every practice area.

How it works

From document to insight in minutes

No implementation team. No 6-month rollout. Drop your files in. Start asking questions.

1

Drop your documents

PDFs, scans, emails, contracts. Drag them into the desktop app. OCR and embeddings run locally on your machine. Nothing leaves until you query.

2

AI extracts, maps, connects

Events, obligations, claims, money flows, entities. Extracted in parallel, cross-validated, and citation-grounded to source text. Autonomous agents build the case map in the background.

3

Ask. Analyze. Act.

Natural language queries, Deep Analyze for comprehensive review, cross-document timelines, and entity dossiers. No training required.

See it in action

From documents to intelligence

Click the tabs to explore. This is the real Prilex interface with a live case file — David Mattson v. Notareal Ltd.

Prilex
All Contracts Pleadings Discovery Research Drafts
Connected
Cases
NotarealMay 3
Meridian CoMay 3
Hamilton TrustMay 3
Add PDFs
PDF Mattson Employment Claim.pdf
PDF Employment Agreement 2018.pdf
PDF Board Minutes Sep 2023.pdf
Timeline
January 20181 event
01st
Managing Director Agreement signed
David MattsonNotareal LtdMattson Claim Docs · 100%
May 20191 event
15th
Amendment to Employee Agreement became effective
David MattsonNotareal LtdMattson Claim Docs · 100%
August 20231 event
31st
Board meeting discussing continuation of CEO role
David MattsonMarcus WebbThomas BergMattson Claim Docs · 100%
September 20234 events
01st
Received draft of board meeting minutes from CEO
David MattsonDavid ChenMattson Claim Docs · 100%
04th
Board meeting minutes (Pöytäkirja 23/2023) registered to the Finnish Trade Register without employee's consent
Notareal LtdMarcus WebbMattson Claim Docs · 100%
05th
Email sent to board members contesting minutes and receiving notice of termination
David MattsonMarcus WebbMattson Claim Docs · 100%
25th
Claim that vacation pay and commission should have been paid by 25 September 2023
David MattsonNotareal LtdUSD 94,000 (vacation pay)USD 6,000 (sales commission)Mattson Claim Docs · 100%
What does David Mattson want?
Based on the documents, David Mattson wants Notareal Ltd to pay him a total of USD 488,080 for what he claims is an unlawful termination of his Managing Director Agreement. He asserts the company failed to follow legal and contractual termination procedures.

Breakdown of Claimed Amounts

Legal ObligationUSDBasis
Termination notice period salary194,04012 months × USD 16,170/month
Severance payment194,04012 months' salary as per contract
Statutory vacation pay94,000123 accrued vacation days
Unpaid sales commissions6,000Work already performed
Summarize the key events What are the total amounts? Who are the parties involved?
USD 488,080 — total claim Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  due within 30 days pending
USD 194,040 — termination notice period salary Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  Sep 2023 – Aug 2024 pending
USD 194,040 — severance payment Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  due 2023-09-30 pending
USD 94,000 — statutory vacation pay Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  due 2023-08-31 pending
USD 6,000 — unpaid sales commissions Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  due 2023-08-31 pending
pay — interest if not paid within 30 days Notareal Ltd → David Mattson  due if not paid within 30 days pending
His demands are undisputed and directly based on law and contracts.
David Mattson  assertion
The board meeting minutes were filed with the PRH without his knowledge or consent.
David Mattson  assertion
The minutes do not contain any mention of the terms under which employment was terminated.
David Mattson  assertion
He did not participate in the decision and did not consent to termination of his CEO agreement.
David Mattson  denial
The filed minutes and their content are erroneous.
David Mattson  assertion
The termination did not follow the notice period nor the legal and contract termination provisions.
David Mattson  denial
He received notice of his termination only after the fact on 5 September 2023.
David Mattson  assertion
The board's decision-making process and its content are legally untenable.
David Mattson  assertion
The company's actions constitute an illegal and contract-violating termination.
David Mattson  assertion
Notareal Ltd → David Mattson
USD 488,080
Total claimed amount for unpaid salary, severance, vacation pay and commissions
claimed
Notareal Ltd → David Mattson
USD 194,040
Termination notice period salary (12 months × USD 16,170/month)
claimed
Notareal Ltd → David Mattson
USD 194,040
Severance payment (12 months' salary) as per contract
claimed
Notareal Ltd → David Mattson
USD 94,000
Statutory vacation pay for 123 accrued vacation days
claimed
Notareal Ltd → David Mattson
USD 6,000
Estimated unpaid sales commissions
claimed
6 entities
David Mattson Claimant
claimant
Notareal Ltd Respondent
respondent
Marcus Webb
unknown
Thomas Berg
unknown
David Chen
unknown
Sarah Kowalski
unknown

The architecture & the capability

Built for the work that matters.

Three architectural choices that make Prilex fundamentally different. Three capabilities those choices unlock. Each would require a legacy legal AI player to rebuild from the ground up.

The architecture — what's structurally ours alone
01

ZDR by architecture, not by clause

External inference routes through dedicated LPU hardware (Groq) with no writable storage: no KV cache, no persistent memory. Our inference partner operates pure compute infrastructure. They do not train models, do not store prompts, and architecturally cannot retain data. If the ZDR endpoint is unavailable, the request dies; it never falls back to a logging path.

retention0 bytes, by hardware
02

Your hardware, your VPC, your jurisdiction

Documents stay on the lawyer's machine. OCR, parsing, and embeddings run locally. Your firm's orchestrator lives on a dedicated VPC in the jurisdiction you choose: Frankfurt, Helsinki, or your own colo. Never multi-tenant.

tenancysingle, per firm
03

An audit trail you can hand a judge

Every query logged with model, prompt hash, tokens, latency, ZDR status, and source documents touched. Exportable as a signed PDF. The same artifact answers your CISO's procurement review and a regulator's discovery request.

formatsigned PDF · per query
The capability — what that architecture lets us deliver
04

Sub-second responses, always

LPU inference delivers responses at interactive speed, not the 20-30 second waits of general-purpose cloud AI. Legal work demands focus, not spinners. Drafting, clause review, and document Q&A feel instantaneous.

responsesub-second streaming
05

Every claim, sourced to the line

Each extracted fact carries a verbatim quote from the source. Click a claim, see the exact paragraph, page, section, document. Citations are generated by retrieval, not the model, so they're verifiable, not invented.

groundingretrieval-bound · 100%
06

Agents that build the case, not just answer it

Background agents map relationships across your matter, surface contradictions between documents, track obligations to their dates, and resolve entities canonically. The output isn't an answer; it's a case map.

working surfacegraph + timeline + dossier
07

Case Overview — the complete picture

Drop your files and Prilex produces a full executive summary: case classification, parties with roles, claims ranked by evidentiary strength, critical dates with dispute flags, evidentiary gaps, and a recommended next step. Every finding traced to its source.

outputexecutive summary + strength analysis
08

500,000 pages overnight

Parallel extraction, embedding, and annotation pipeline processes 500,000 pages in 8 hours on cloud infrastructure. What a 20-person legal team takes months to review, Prilex handles while you sleep. Per-document cost: under 20 cents.

throughput500K pages / 8 hours
09

Cross-document intelligence

Prilex doesn't just read each document; it connects them. Entity resolution across files, contradiction detection between accounts, and cross-document timelines mean you see the full picture, not isolated fragments.

linkingcross-document + entity aware
Inside the product

What the desktop app actually does

Here's what happens when you drop a demand letter, contract, or court filing into Prilex.

TIMELINE
Apr 5 · Demand letter sent
Apr 8 · Payment due
Apr 15 · Breach alleged
OBLIGATIONS
Nordic Innovations Ltd → pay €488K
Due: 30 days from notice
CLAIMS
Claimant asserts breach of contract
MONEY
€488,000 unpaid compensation

Multi-view extraction

One document, five structured views. Events, obligations, claims, money flows, and entities. All extracted in parallel, cross-validated, and citation-grounded to the source text.

Events Obligations Claims Money flows Entities
Arctic Circle Innovations Ltd
ACI Arctic Circle Innovations
3 documents · 12 events · Role: claimant

Entity resolution across documents

"ACI" in the demand letter, "Arctic Circle Innovations" in the contract, and "Arctic Circle Innovations Ltd" in the court filing. Prilex knows they're the same entity. One click to see every event involving them across your entire case.

Cross-document Alias detection Entity timeline
Deep Analyze: Demand Letter
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Demand letter claiming €488K in unpaid compensation...
TIMELINE
Aug 2016 · Agreement signed
Apr 2018 · Payment obligations arise
Mar 2026 · Demand letter sent

Deep Analyze

One click on any document for a comprehensive legal analysis: executive summary, chronological timeline with ALLEGED vs ESTABLISHED distinction, claims table, obligations, financial summary, strengths and weaknesses for both parties, and recommended actions.

Full-document analysis ALLEGED vs ESTABLISHED Actionable insights
Architecture

Admissible. Auditable. Defensible.

Every byte of your data stays in infrastructure you control. Inference runs on ZDR-by-architecture endpoints, not contractual promises. Every call is logged and auditable.

Data flow — where your data lives, and what crosses the boundary

Your machine

Documents, OCR, and embeddings stay local. Nothing leaves your device until you query. The desktop app is your first and last line of defense.

locationlocal only

Your private VPC

A dedicated orchestrator on infrastructure you control. Routes queries, enforces ZDR, and logs every external call. Per-customer, single-tenant, in your jurisdiction.

tenancysingle, per firm

ZDR inference endpoints

Two-tier: LPU processors for real-time work (no KV cache, no disk, stateless by design) and Fireworks ZDR enterprise for heavy reasoning with DeepSeek V4. Both are ZDR by architecture, not by contract.

providersLPU + Fireworks ZDR
Orchestrator regions — dedicated VPC, your geography
Germany
Finland
USA (East)
USA (West)
Singapore
Ready to try it on your own documents? Join Waitlist

How we compare

Not another chatbot. A case intelligence platform.

Leading legal AI tools route through shared cloud infrastructure. Here's the honest comparison with our approach.

PrilexLegal AI Platforms
Data privacy model Architectural ZDR Contractual ZDR only
InfrastructurePer-customer isolated VPCShared multi-tenant cloud
Model training on your data Impossible by architecture Opt-out only
PlatformNative desktop + webWeb browser only
Speed (interactive)Sub-second streaming~50 tok/sec (cloud GPUs)
Citation grounding Verbatim quotes with offsetsSentence-level footnotes
Price$249/user/mo (annual)$1,000–1,200/seat/mo
Minimum commitmentNone — cancel anytime$30K–$60K/year
Onboarding~5 minutes, self-serve3–6 months, high-touch
ContractMonth-to-monthAnnual
Audit trail Signed PDF exportInternal logging only
Ready to try it on your own documents? Join Waitlist

Timeline
Obligations
Claims
Money
Entities
Query